Mendeley Zotero Comparison Essay

Kratochvíl, Jiří Comparison of the Accuracy of Bibliographical References Generated for Medical Citation Styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2017, vol. 43, n. 1, pp. 57-66. [Journal article (Paginated)]

English abstract

Bibliographical references to online and printed articles, books, contributions to edited books and web resources generated by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero were compared with manually written references according to the citation instructions in 15 biomedical journals and the NLM citation style. The fewest mistakes were detected in references generated by Zotero for 11 journals and the NLM style, while the second fewest number of mistakes was found in Mendeley. The largest number of mistakes for 9 journals was found in references generated by EndNote and in the other 4 journals the largest number of mistakes was detected in RefWorks references. With regard to the individual types of resources, the lowest number of mistakes was shown by Zotero, while RefWorks had the greatest number of mistakes. All programs had problems especially with generating the URL and the date of access in the reference to online documents. It was also found that several mistakes were caused by technical limitations of the reference managers, while other mistakes originated due to incorrect setting of the citation styles. A comparison showed that Zotero and Mendeley are the most suitable managers.

Check full metadata for this record

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item
Skip to main content

Overview

 ZoteroMendeleyEndNote X6
CostFreeFreeNot free: Purchase
AccessFirefox Add-on or Zotero Standalone .Desktop application; web-based application Desktop application; syncing enabled through web application (EndNote Web)
Cross-platformYes: Windows, OS X, and LinuxYes: Windows, OS X, and LinuxYes: Windows and OS X
Organize PDFs and other documentsYesYesYes
Selective syncing of documentsYesYesNo
Annotate / highlight PDFsNoYesYes
TaggingYes (with color tagging)Yes Yes (Keywords)
Full-text searching across PDFsYes: not enabled by defaultYesYes
Private groupsYesYesYes
Public groupsYesYesNo
Community networkYesYesNo
Mobile appYes: iOS and AndroidYes: iOS and Android (beta)Yes: iOS

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *