Time Dependent Pharmacokinetics Introduction Classification Essay

On By In 1

Developmental Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Populations

Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island

Corresponding author.

Correspondence Sara Rosenbaum, PhD, Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Rhode Island, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881, email: ude.iru@raras

Author information ►Copyright and License information ►

Copyright © 2014 Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group

Abstract

Information on drug absorption and disposition in infants and children has increased considerably over the past 2 decades. However, the impact of specific age-related effects on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and dose requirements remains poorly understood. Absorption can be affected by the differences in gastric pH and stomach emptying time that have been observed in the pediatric population. Low plasma protein concentrations and a higher body water composition can change drug distribution. Metabolic processes are often immature at birth, which can lead to a reduced clearance and a prolonged half-life for those drugs for which metabolism is a significant mechanism for elimination. Renal excretion is also reduced in neonates due to immature glomerular filtration, tubular secretion, and reabsorption. Limited data are available on the pharmacodynamic behavior of drugs in the pediatric population. Understanding these age effects provide a mechanistic way to identify initial doses for the pediatric population. The various factors that impact pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics mature towards adult values at different rates, thus requiring continual modification of drug dose regimens in neonates, infants, and children. In this paper, the age-related changes in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination in infants and children are reviewed, and the age-related dosing regimens for this population are discussed.

INDEX TERMS: cytochrome P450, development, pediatrics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics

INTRODUCTION

The pediatric population is composed of a number of very different subpopulations. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance (1998) breaks down this population into the following groups: neonates (birth to 1 month), infants (1 month to 2 years), developing children (2–12 years), and adolescents (12–16 years).1 These groups differ in terms of physical size, body composition, physiology, and biochemistry. Growth and development occur particularly rapidly during the first 2 years of life. Body weight typically doubles by 6 months of age and triples by the first year of life. Body surface area (BSA) doubles during the first year.2 Proportions of body water, fat, and protein continuously change during infancy and childhood. Major organ systems mature in size as well as function during infancy and childhood. Additionally, the pathophysiology of some diseases and pharmacologic receptor functions change during infancy and childhood and differ from adults. For example, most cases of hypertension in children are secondary to renal disease, whereas most cases of hypertension in adults are primary or essential. This has profound effects on the design of antihypertensive drug trials with children.3 Data available on receptor sensitivity during the neonatal period are limited. A published study found that neonates and young infants displayed an increased sensitivity to d-tubocurarine at the neuromuscular junction compared to adults.4 All of the previously mentioned changes affect the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and optimum doses of various drugs in the infant and developing child.

see Editorial on page 260

Ethical concerns impeded early clinical studies in the pediatric population. Thus, clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in the pediatric population did not begin until the 1970s. The FDA Modernization Act (FDAMA; 1997) and the Pediatric Rule (1998) have been driving forces for the conduct of pediatric studies. These studies have demonstrated the existence of many pharmacokinetic and some pharmacodynamic differences among the pediatric population.5,6 Traditional studies demonstrated that pharmacokinetic parameters including half-life, apparent volume of distribution (Vd), and total plasma clearance vary among different age groups even when normalized by body weight.7 These findings were supported by population analyses across broad age ranges, which found that age, in addition to body size, is an important determinant of pharmacokinetic parameters the pediatric population.8–,12 The age dependency is a function of body composition, organ functions, ontogeny of drug biotransformation pathways, disease progression, pharmacological receptor functions, and appears to be especially important during the first 2 years of life.13 Understanding these age effects provide a mechanistic way to identify initial doses for the pediatric population.

The purpose of this review is to summarize quantitative and qualitative developmental changes in the neonate, infant, and developing child, and discuss how these affect PK, PD, and dose requirements for this population. Approaches that can use this information to determine age-specific dosing regimens are discussed.

ABSORPTION

In contrast to intravenous administration, drugs administrated extravascularly must undergo absorption in order to reach the systemic circulation. The process is characterized by 2 important parameters, the rate and the extent of drug absorption. The former affects the onset of action of the drug, and the latter essentially controls the effective dose.

In the gastrointestinal tract, several age-related anatomic and physiological changes have been found to influence drug absorption (Table 1). Gastric pH is neutral at birth but falls to pH 1–3 within 24 to 48 hours after birth. The pH then gradually returns to neutral again by day 8 and subsequently declines very slowly, reaching adult values only after 2 years of age.14,15 This higher pH in neonates and young infants may have a protective effect on acid-labile drugs and may at least partially account for the higher bioavailability of betalactam antibiotics.16 The bioavailability of orally administered weak acids, such as phenytoin, acetaminophen, and phenobarbital, may be reduced in infants and young children due to increased ionization under achlorhydric conditions.17,18

Table 1.

Developmental Factors Affecting Drug Pharmacokinetics in Neonates and Infants

Gastric emptying and intestinal motility are important determinants for the rate of drug absorption in the small intestine, the major site of drug absorption. Gastric emptying time during the neonatal period is prolonged relative to that of the adult. This may partially account for delayed absorption for orally administered phenobarbital, digoxin, and sulfonamides.19 Other factors such as reduced intestinal absorption surface area and shorter gut transit time may also be responsible for the delayed absorption observed in neonates.

The age-dependent changes in biliary function and activities of pancreatic enzymes can compromise the body's ability to solubilize and subsequently absorb some lipophilic drugs. For example, this is believed to reduce the absorption of prodrug esters such as erythromycin that require solubilization or intraluminal hydrolysis.20

Developmental changes in the activity of intestinal drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters could potentially alter the bioavailability of drugs. At this time, these developmental changes have not been completely characterized, as few clinical studies have addressed this issue. The marked decrease in midazolam's oral clearance (CL/F) in preterm infants is believed to be the result of an immature intestinal cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzyme system, which results in decreased presystemic intestinal metabolism and an increased bioavailability (F).21 One study observed that intestinal biopsy specimens from young children (1–3 years old) had a 77% higher busulfan glutathione conjugation rate compared to older children (9–17 years old). In contrast to the effect on midazolam, this may lead to an enhanced first-pass intestinal metabolism and a reduced absorption fraction (F) in young children.22 Gabapentin absorption is dependent on the L-amino acid transporter system in intestinal membrane. Oral clearance (CL/F) of gabapentin is 33% higher in younger children (<5 years) than in older children (5–12 years) or adults.23 An immature L-amino transporter activity, which results in a lower bioavailability, is believed to be responsible for this effect.24 P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an efflux transporter that also plays a part in intestinal absorption. An analysis of P-gp expression in human intestinal tissue found relatively low levels in the neonatal group. The expression increased with age to reach maximum levels in young adults (15–38 years of age). The study also found decreased levels (half the maximal adult levels) in older individuals (67–85 years).25 However, the clinical importance of developmental changes of P-gp has not been studied.

Developmental changes also can alter the absorption of drugs by other extravascular routes. Percutaneous absorption of drugs through skin may be high in newborns and infants owing to several factors including: better hydration of the epidermis, greater perfusion of the subcutaneous layer, and the larger ratio of total BSA to body mass compared to adults. Thus, topically applied steroids in newborns and infants can result in unanticipated systemic absorption and has resulted in toxic effects in some instances.26 The absorption of intramuscularly administered drugs may be delayed in neonates as a result of reduced blood flow to skeletal muscles, although in clinical practice absorption from this route has been found to be unpredictable.27

DISTRIBUTION

Independent of the route of administration, once the drug enters the blood stream, it distributes throughout the vascular system and to other areas of the body. A drug's distribution characteristics are summarized by the parameter, apparent Vd, which is the ratio of the amount of drug in the body to the corresponding plasma concentration. Clinically, a drug's Vd is important because it controls the value of a loading dose, and along with a drug's clearance, it determines a drug's half-life.28 A large Vd (the plasma concentration is relatively small for a given amount of drug in the body) indicates extensive drug distribution to the tissues. A small Vd (the plasma concentration is relatively high for a given amount of drug in the body) suggests less extensive distribution from the plasma, and may indicate that a drug is highly bound to plasma proteins, a process that inhibits the distribution of drug from the plasma. A drug's Vd is determined by tissue binding, plasma protein binding, and the physiochemical properties of the drug, such as lipid and water solubility, which impact the body compartments that a drug can access.

The dramatic maturation changes in the relative amount of body water and fat have been well characterized by Friis-Hansen.29 Total body water, expressed as percentage of body weight, decreases with age, from approximately 80% in newborns to 60% by 1 year of age. Conversely, body fat increases with age, from 1% to 2% in a preterm neonate to 10% to 15% in a term neonate and 20 to 25% in a 1-year-old. The impact of these differences on the Vd depends on the physiochemical characteristics of the drug. Highly water-soluble compounds, such as gentamicin, have larger volumes of distribution in neonates compared to adults. For example gentamicin's Vd is around 0.5 L/kg in neonates, compared to 0.25 to 0.3 L/kg in adults. As a result, a larger milligram per kilogram loading dose may be needed to achieve desired therapeutic concentrations in neonates.30 Lipophilic drugs, such as diazepam, tend to have smaller volumes of distribution in infants than in older children and adults.18

Plasma protein binding of drugs tends to be reduced in neonates and infants.31 A decreased plasma protein binding is due not only to the reduction of the total amount of plasma proteins, but also to the diminished binding affinity and the high concentrations of endogenous competing substrates. In theory reduced protein binding may result in an increased distribution of drugs from the plasma to the rest of the body, which may be associated with an increased Vd. For example, a decrease in the plasma protein binding of phenobarbital and an increased Vd was observed in neonates.18 Changes in protein binding can also complicate the interpretation of measured drug plasma concentrations in neonates and young infants. Although the unbound concentration is the pharmacologically active critical component, typically the total plasma concentration of a drug is measured. As a result interpretation of the total plasma concentration can be difficult for drugs such as phenytoin, which are both highly bound and have a narrow therapeutic range.32 Finally, it is worthwhile to mention that highly bound acid drugs such as sulfonamides can compete for bilirubin-binding sites on albumin and displace bilirubin when plasma albumin level is low. This leads to increased blood levels of unconjugated bilirubin and increased risk of kernicterus in the fetus or neonate.33 Ceftriaxone is another example, although it has not been formally implicated in the pathogenesis in kernicterus. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that ceftriaxone can displace bilirubin from its binding to serum albumin at the therapeutic levels, leading to a possible risk of bilirubin encephalopathy in neonates.34,35

HEPATIC METABOLISM

Drug metabolism can be divided into Phase I and Phase II metabolism. Phase I metabolism involves small structural alterations to the drug molecule. The primary purpose is to decrease lipophilicity and enhance renal excretion of the molecule. Phase I metabolism also often results in the introduction or unmasking of a functional group. Phase II metabolism involves the conjugation of a functional group on the molecule (parent drug or Phase I metabolites) with hydrophilic endogenous substrates (e.g. glucuronidation, sulfation, acetylation). Although the kidney, intestine, lung, and skin are also capable of biotransformation, the liver is quantitatively the most important organ for drug metabolism.36 Studies over the last decade on the age-dependent development of the drug metabolizing enzymes have found that each different enzyme system has its own unique pattern of development.

The majority of Phase I drug reactions are mediated by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, a super family of multiple hemeproteins. The specific families or enzymes that are of greatest importance in the metabolism of drugs are CYP3A4/7, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 1A2, 2E1, and 2B6. 37 Other than CYPs, the flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMO) enzymes are also important for the oxidative metabolism of a wide variety of therapeutic drug, including nicotine, clozapine, sulindac sulfide, and ranitidine.38,39 In comparison to the CYP family, less is known about the role played by this family of enzymes, but it appears to be less crucial to the efficacy and/or toxicity of drugs than the CYP family.38Figure 1 lists the ontogenesis for primary CYP enzymes.40–,47 Briefly, CYP3A7 is the primary isoenzyme expressed during the prenatal period. It declines rapidly after birth and is barely measurable in adults. The expression of CY-P2E1 and CYP2D6 begin to rise at the time of birth. The expression of CYP3A4, 2C9, and 2C19 occurs during the first weeks of life. The expression of CYP1A2, the last enzyme to develop, is present by 1 to 3 months of life. The activity of these enzymes increases over time but not in a linear manner with age. By 1 to 2 years of age, all the isoenzyme activities are similar to those of adults.48

Figure 1.

Developmental profiles of major hepatic cytochrome P450s (A) and CYP3A7 (B). The postnatal evolution of P450 isoforms was explored in a liver bank comprising samples from fetus, neonates, infants, and adults. Isoform enzyme activity was characterized...

Clinically, the elimination of a drug is quantified using the parameter clearance, which is a measure of the body's ability to remove drug from the plasma. The developmental changes observed in the enzymatic systems have been supported by the age-related changes in the clearance in several drugs, as well as changes in the metabolic ratios of probe substrates to their metabolites in vivo. For example, the rise of the expression of CYP2D6 was associated with the rise in dextromethorphan O-demethylation, which was assessed using the urinary ratio of dextromethorphan to dextorphan.49,50 Similarly, the delayed ontogenesis of CYP1A2 protein was consistent with the in vivo data where CYP1A2 mediated N3 and N7 demethylation products of caffeine represented 6% to 8% of the total biotransformation in neonates and increased to about 28% in infants aged 2 to 10 months.51 In addition, the developmental sequence of the CYP isoenzymes can also be demonstrated by noting changes in the relative amount of metabolites produced from the different pathways. For example, CYP2D6-mediated O-demethylation of diazepam has been reported to develop sooner than the CYP3A4-mediated N-demethylation by, which is in line with the in vitro observations on the ontogeny of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 CYP3A4.52

The ontogeny of hepatic FMO exhibits a similar developmental pattern as the CYP3A family. The isoenzyme FMO1 has a similar developmental pattern to CYP3A7. Its expression is at the highest at 8 to 15 weeks of gestation. It subsequently declines during the fetal development and completely absent within 72 postnatal hours. FMO3 is more analogous to CYP3A4. It has negligible expression in the neonatal period and becomes detectable only by 1 to 2 years of age. The delayed onset of FMO3 expression results a null FMO phenotype in the neonate.53 Since FMO3 is selective in the N-oxygenation of trimethylamine, this observation may explain the transient trimethylaminuria reported in a 2-month-old infant.54

In contrast to the CYP enzymes, isoform-specific quantitative data for the development of Phase II enzymes are very limited. The timelines for the detection of Phase II enzymes in the fetus, neonate, and infant are shown in Table 2.55,56 The development of the uridine 5-diphosphoglucuronic acid glucuronyl transferases (UGTs) is of greatest interest since this family of enzymes is responsible for the metabolism of almost 15% of drugs eliminated by metabolism.57 Several drugs commonly used in the pediatric population are substrates for the UGTs. These substrates include acetaminophen (UGT1A6 and, to a lesser extent, 1A9), morphine (UGT2B7), and zidovudine (UGT1A6). Among the UGT isoforms, UGT 1A1 and 2B7 develop quickly, and UGT1A6 and 1A9 develop more slowly.58 The expression of UGT1A1, the major enzyme responsible for bilirubin glucuronidation, is triggered at birth and the activity reaches adult levels by 3 to 6 months postnatal age (PNA). UGT2B7 is present in fetus, and increases at birth. Adult levels are attained by 2 to 6 months of age. UGT1A6 is undetectable in the fetus. Its expression increases slightly in neonates, but does not reach adult levels until 10 years of age.

Table 2.

In Vitro Ontogeny of Human Hepatic Phase II Enzymes (Adapted From Ref.55,56)

These data are consistent with the pharmacokinetic data of UGT substrates assessed in vivo. For example, the metabolic clearance of morphine, which is primarily metabolized by UGT2B7 to morphine 6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucoroide, is low in neonates and reaches adult levels between 2 and 6 months.59 Morphine-6-glucuronide, which contributes to the analgesic effect of morphine, is primarily eliminated renally. Thus, it is possible that the clearance of this metabolite will be reduced in neonates due to immature renal function. Although lower morphine doses may be effective in neonates, it is difficult to translate the lower clearance of morphine into specific dosing recommendations. As an additional complication, it is possible that the opioid receptors may not be fully developed in this population. 59 Similarly, acetaminophen glucuronidation is lower in newborns and young children compared to adolescents and adults.60 The “gray-baby” syndrome, which is associated with the administration of chloramphenicol (substrate of UGT2B7) in neonates and consists of emesis, abdominal distension, abnormal respiration, cyanosis, cardiovascular collapse, and death, is believed to be the result of the reduced glucuronidation and clearance of chloramphenicol in this population, which leads to very high plasma concentrations of the drug.61

Sulfation, another Phase II conjugation, appears to be well developed at birth. The variation in the development and function of the two Phase II reactions is reflected by acetaminophen metabolism. In early infancy, acetaminophen is primarily converted into the sulfate conjugates, but with increasing age, glucuronidation becomes the predominant form of metabolism.13 Studies on the development of acetylation have found reduced activity in the first month of life. Interestingly, the effect of age appears to be less dominant than that of polymorphism of N-acetyltransferase.56 Esterase activity is also reduced in newborn and this may partly account for the prolonged effects of local anesthetics.62

In conclusion, both Phase I and II metabolic processes are immature at birth. These deficiencies may result in the increased risk for drug toxicity in infants and young children. The ontogeny of drug-metabolizing enzymes will clearly have to translate into age-related dosage adjustment for some therapeutic agents in pediatric patients. A typical example is the clinical use of theophylline in neonates and infants with apnea or chronic lung disease. Since the hepatic metabolism of theophylline is decreased in neonates due to the protracted expression of CYP1A2, a greater portion of theophylline is excreted in the urine compared to older children and adults.63 The theophylline clearance is about two- to three fold less in neonates than in adults due to the compensate renal elimination pathway.64 A small portion of theophylline is also methylated to form caffeine, an active metabolite. Since neonates have decreased demethylation, theophylline-derived caffeine cannot be easily metabolized and therefore accumulates. As a result, the maintenance dose of theophylline is substantially reduced in neonates.65 Other drugs that undergo extensive metabolism, including diazepam, phenytoin, and chloramphenicol, are often observed to have prolonged half-lives in neonates and young infants. As a result, a decreased daily maintenance dose or an increased dosing interval may be needed in order to avoid drug accumulation.

The transporter-mediated uptake of drugs into the hepatocytes and efflux into the bile is often referred to as the Phase III hepatic pathway. Important uptake transporters include the organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs), organic anion transporters (OATs), and organic cation transporters (OCTs). Clinically important efflux transporters at canalicular membrane include P-gp, breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP), bile salt export protein (BSEP), and multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1). At this time, there are few data in humans on the ontogeny expression of liver transporters.66 There are some data on the developmental pattern of P-gp in humans. P-gp mRNA and protein were detected in human liver as early as 11 to 14 weeks of gestation.67 A single study suggested that hepatic P-gp expression increases during the first few months of life and reaches adult levels by 2 years of age.68 The clinical significance of developmental changes in transporter functions has not been systematically studied in humans.

In addition to size and ontogeny of enzyme and transporters, other factors such as genetic polymorphism, prenatal or postnatal exposure to modifiers of the activity of the drug metabolizing enzymes and transporter systems might also have an independent impact on the phenotypic metabolic activity observed.69 Tramadol (M) hydrochloride is catalyzed to O-demethyl tramadol (M1) in liver primarily by CYP2D6. The urinary ratio of tramadol to O-demethyl tramadol (log M/M1) is widely used as a marker of CYP2D6 activity in adults. Allegaert et al70 recently found a significant decrease in urine log and plasma log M/M1 with increasing CYP2D6 genotype activity score. The activity score is a quantitative classification of CYP2D6 genotypes with values indicating the relative activity of each CYP2D6 allele to the fully functional reference CYP2D6*1 allele. The results indicated CYP2D6 polymorphisms had a significant impact on O-demethylation of tramadol in neonates and young infants, and contributed to the interindividual variability.

RENAL ELIMINATION

Excretion of drugs by the kidneys is dependent on 3 processes: glomerular filtration, tubular excretion, and tubular reabsorption. To summarize, in the first step of excretion the free drug in the plasma (the protein bound component is too large) is filtered across the glomerular membrane into the renal tubule. The tubule transporter systems in the renal tubular membrane may augment drug excretion by promoting the passage of drugs from the plasma into the tubule. In the distal part of the renal tubule, lipophilic drugs may be reabsorbed by passive diffusion from the tubule back into the blood. The renal clearance (CLr) of drugs is the sum of 3 processes (Equation 1). Each of these processes exhibit independent rate and pattern of development.

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is often used to assess renal function, and Figure 2 shows the how it changes over time in the pediatric population.71,72 In the full-term newborn, GFR is around 10 to 20 mL/min/m2 at birth. This increases rapidly to 20 to 30 mL/min/m2 during the first weeks of life and typically reaches adult values (70 mL/min/m2) by 3 to 5 months. Furthermore, the increase in GFR is highly dependent on PNA, the chronological age since birth. Hayton et al65 described the maturation of GFR with PNA using a nonlinear function. A more practical equation (Equation 2) for estimating age-specific renal glomerular filtration rate (CLGFR) was proposed by Schwartz and coworkers.73

Figure 2.

Developmental changes of renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured by mannitol clearance. (Data adapted from Ref. 71,72).

Where, CLr, Cr is creatinine clearance (mL/min/1.73 m2); Ht is height (cm) and SCr is serum creatinine concentration (mg/dL); K is a constant of proportionality, which is different for children in different age bands. K is 0.33, 0.45, 0.55, 0.55, and 0.7 for preterm infants, full term infants (0–12 months), children (1–12 years), female adolescents (13–21 years), and male adolescents (13–21 years), respectively.

For drugs that are mainly excreted by glomerular filtration (e.g. aminoglycosides), initial dose adjustments can be made by either increasing the dosing interval or decreasing the dose.

In contrast to glomerular filtration, tubular secretary and reabsorptive capacity appear to mature at much slower rates. Tubular secretion, assessed by the renal clearance of p-aminohippurate (a substrate of renal OAT), is reduced at birth to approximately 20% to 30% of adult capacity but matures by 15 months of age.72 The development of other renal uptake transporters such as OCT and OATP is unknown.

Tubular reabsorption is the last renal function to mature and does not reach adult levels until 2 years of age. This delay in the development of tubular functions may have variable effect on some drugs' clearance for which tubular secretion or reabsorption is important in adults. For example, digoxin, which undergoes some active secretion, has a reported average renal clearance of 1.92, 3.94, and 5.20 L/hr/1.73 m2 in full term infants less than 1 week of age, 3-month-old infants, and children of 1.5 years of old, respectively.74 At this time, there is little information in the literature about the ontogeny of renal drug transport systems and their impact on renal elimination in infants and children. Generally, for drugs principally eliminated by kidney, immature renal clearance processes result in the inefficient elimination of drugs and prolongation of their half-lives.75

PHARMACODYNAMICS

Unlike the rapidly accumulating knowledge of the pharmacokinetic changes associated with development, little is known about receptor development, and how maturation affects the drug-receptor interaction and response. Most often, the apparent developmental differences in drug efficacy or the incidence of adverse effects have been linked with pharmacokinetic differences. For example, the higher acid inhibition effect of lansoprazole in infants appears to be associated with reduced drug elimination.76,77 The increased hepatoxicity of valproic acid in young children was related to increased formation of hepatoxic metabolites.32 The existence of true age-dependent differences in receptor sensitivity appears to be supported by data on a few drugs. For example, Takahashi et al78 reported that the mean plasma concentrations of unbound S-warfarin in the prepubertal (age 1–11 years), pubertal (age 12–17 years), and adult patients were comparable, but the prepubertal patients showed significantly greater international normalized ratio than the adult patients. The data suggested that prepubertal patients are more sensitive to the effects of warfarin than adult patients.

Marshall and Kearns79 reported the in vitro developmental PD for cyclosporine. Two independent and specific pharmacodynamic markers of cyclosporine-mediated immunosuppression, peripheral blood monocyte (PBM) proliferation and inter-leukin-2 expression, were studied. The mean IC50 of cyclosporine on the inhibition of PBM proliferation was twofold lower among infant subjects than older subjects. The mean IC90 of cyclosporine that corresponded to 90% inhibition of interleukin-2 expression in PBM cultures was sevenfold lower in infants than in older age groups. The study provided relevant information on developmental changes in receptor binding characteristics in vitro, but this may not be reflective of the response in vivo, owing to the complexity of the in vivo immune system. Reliable in vivo surrogate markers for cyclosporine must be developed and combined with individual PK in order to fully understand drug response in the pediatric population and to identify optimum therapeutic plasma concentrations in this group.

APPROACH TO AGE-RELATED DOSING REGIMENS

Simple dosage formulas (normalized by body weight or BSA) and allometric scaling may be clinically applicable in children older than 2 years of age.80 In neonates and young infants, where age-related developmental changes in drug disposition are underway, age-specific dosing regimens are needed based on observed age-related changes in bioavailability, Vd, and overall clearance. Those examples have been demonstrated in a widely used pediatric dosage handbook. However, the rationales behind those age-related dosing regimens have not been well elaborated. This section will comment on the clinical study design, data collection, and analysis approaches, which are used to support those conclusions.

In clinical practice, when pharmacokinetic data in children are available standard pharmacokinetic equations can be used to estimate doses based on drug clearance and target exposure. The traditional approach to generating pharmacokinetic data is based on a relatively small number of subjects from whom multiple samples are taken. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters are determined and then pooled. However, it is usually not practicable to recruit sufficient numbers of patients to assess the true interindividual variability. The results generated from these descriptive PK or PK/PD studies usually have little impact on dosing guidelines for a specific therapeutic agent and generally have not been found to provide sufficient guidance for clinicians.81 For this reason, the population pharmacokinetic data analysis from a large number of individuals in well-designed population PK or PK/PD studies is recommended.82

The population approach is ideal for studying the pediatric population since a large heterogeneous population can be studied by taking only a few samples per patient at flexible sampling times.83 Pharmacokinetic parameters and associated variability are calculated for all patients simultaneously. Furthermore, covariate analysis can be performed to identify demographic factors that explain the variability, such as body weight and age. The population pharmacokinetic approach is commonly used to obtain age-associated pharmacokinetic parameters. The selected population model usually includes the relationship between patient characteristics such as body weight and age and one or more of the pharmacokinetic parameters. For example, body weight may be added as an important determinant of the parameter clearance (CL), which is used to assess elimination. Weight is often included using allometric scaling according to the formula (Equation 3):

where CLi represents the clearance in the patient, CLTV the typical value for clearance in the specific population, BWi the individual body weight, median BW is the median body weight of the population, and EXP the exponent. The exponent can be either fixed or estimated during the analysis.12 For example, in the study of zidovudine PK in HIV-infected infants and children, the above model was used for clearance and Vd with the EXP fixed at 0.75 for clearance and 1 for Vd.9 The effect of other patient characteristics such as age and liver enzymes data was also evaluated.

Moreover, if clinical response data are available, it may be possible to create integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model, which would allow better optimization of pediatric dosing. For example, a population PK-PD model developed for the postoperative sedative effect of midazolam was used to optimize the dose of midazolam in nonventilated infants aged 3 months to 2 years old.84

In the absence of established dosing guidelines or complete pharmacokinetic data in children, methods to approximate the initial dose for an infant are proposed as “bottom-up” approaches. To date there are several “bottom-up” approaches for pediatric dose selection. Bartelink et al85 proposed dosing guidelines on the basis of the route of administration, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug, and the age of the child. In general, the loading dose of a drug is based on the Vd, whereas the maintenance dose is determined by the clearance. With respect to Vd, Bartelink et al85 pointed out that potential changes are drug dependent and that drugs with a large Vd in adults are best normalized to bodyweight in young children younger than 2 years. In contrast, drugs with a small Vd in adults are best normalized to BSA. With respect to clearance, Bartelink et al85 pointed out that after the maturation process is complete clearance is mainly determined by growth and the blood supply to the kidneys and liver. They recommend that drugs primarily metabolized by the liver should be administered with extreme care until the age of 2 months and that modification of the dose should be based on response and on therapeutic drug monitoring. They recommend the use of a general guideline based on body weight as the basis of dosing from 2 to 6 months and BSA after 6 months of age except for drugs that are primarily metabolized by CYP2D6 and UGTs. For drugs that are significantly excreted by the kidney, measures of renal function such as creatinine clearance should be used for dose justification in children < 2 years of age. Once the kidneys are fully matured, BSA is recommended as the basis for drug doses.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling offers a promising alternative approach to assist with first-time dosing in children.86 A number of pediatric PBPK models have been developed to predict PK in children, one of which was presented by Edginton et al87 who used PK-Sim to apply the model to acetaminophen, alfentanil, morphine, theophylline, and levofloxacin. In general, an existing adult PBPK model is extended to reflect age-related physiological changes in children from birth to age 18. The age-modified model is then used together with a previously developed age-specific clearance model that incorporates information on the development of renal and/or hepatic function to predict pediatric plasma concentrations.88–,90 PBPK models combine the developmental physiological processes of the child with adult PK data. Thus they require the drug-specific information (PK parameters in the adult) and system-specific information on the ontogeny of anatomical, physiological, and biochemical variables from birth to age 18. Often physiological data from multiple literature sources is required, and in many cases accurate data from humans of all ages is not as yet available. Moreover, there is no consensus on the value of the physiological parameters in the pediatric population. Usually age-related functions are applied to existing data from various sources and the missing data for some age ranges are interpolated or extrapolated from these functions. Many of these equations are often validated internally by each author or modeling group. For example, 4 different ontogeny functions on hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme have been in published PBPK papers.87,88,91,92 Additionally, data on tissue composition (proportion of lipids, protein, and water) are limited in the pediatric population. This information is critical for the prediction of the tissue blood partition coefficient.93 In the absence of this information, the coefficient in children may be assumed to be equal to that in adults.

CONCLUSION

An advance in developmental pharmacology during the past decades has improved our understanding of the influence of growth and maturation on the absorption, disposition, and actions of drugs. Pediatric clinical studies, encouraged by regulatory agencies, have facilitated improvements in drug therapy for this population.94 Based on the current knowledge, it should be obvious that the dosing regimen for adults cannot be simply or linearly extrapolated to children, particularly in neonates and infants. The application of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic methods to this population has been widely advocated and is described in the Guidance Documents of FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA).1,95 The use of PBPK models has been recommended to help in the first time dosing in children as well as in the design of pediatric clinical studies.91,96 However, there is a strong need for more research on developmental pharmacology such as the ontogeny of drug metabolizing enzymes, transporters, receptor system, and disease progress. As the gaps in our knowledge are gradually filled, the development of therapeutic pediatric dosing regimen will be enhanced, and drugs will eventually be provided to children with greater precision and safety.

ABBREVIATIONS

BSAbody surface area
CYPcytochrome P450
CLclearance
EMAEuropean Medicines Agency
FDAFood and Drug Administration
FDAMAFood and Drug Administration Modernization Act
FMOflavin-containing monooxygenase
GFRglomerular filtration rate
NATN-acetyltransferase
OATorganic anion transporter
OATPorganic anion transporting polypeptide
OCTorganic cation transporter
PBMperipheral blood monocyte
PBPKphysiologically based pharmacokinetics
PDpharmacodynamics
P-gpP-glycoprotein
PKpharmacokinetics
PNApostnatal age
UGTuridine 5-diphosphoglucuronic acid glucuronyl transferases
Vdvolume of distribution

Footnotes

Disclosure The authors declare no conflicts or financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employment, gifts, and honoraria.

REFERENCES

1. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: General Considerations for Pediatric Pharmacokinetic Studies for Drugs and Biological Products. Rockville, MD: FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 1998.

2. Yaffe S, Estabrook RWE, Bouxsein P Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. Rational therapeutics for infants and children: workshop summary [online]

3. Benjamin DKJ, Smith PB, Jadhav P et al. Pediatric antihypertensive trial failures: analysis of end points and dose range. Hypertension. 2008;51(4):834–840.[PMC free article][PubMed]

4. Fisher DM, O'Keeffe C, Stanski DR et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of d-tubocurarine in infants, children, and adults. Anesthesiology. 1982;57(3):203–208.[PubMed]

5. Alcorn J, McNamara PJ. Pharmacokinetics in the newborn. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(5):667–686.[PubMed]

6. Ginsberg G, Hattis D, Sonawane B et al. Evaluation of child/adult pharmacokinetic differences from a database derived from the therapeutic drug literature. Toxicol Sci. 2002;66(2):185–200.[PubMed]

7. Sumpter A, Anderson BJ. Pediatric pharmacology in the first year of life. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(4):469–475.[PubMed]

8. Madabushi R, Cox DS, Hossain M et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic basis for effective argatroban dosing in pediatrics. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51(1):19–28.[PubMed]

9. Mirochnick M, Capparelli E, Connor J. Pharmacokinetics of zidovudine in infants: a population analysis across studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;66(1):16–24.[PubMed]

10. van der Marel CD, Anderson BJ, van Lingen RA et al. Paracetamol and metabolite pharmacokinetics in infants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59(3):243–251.[PubMed]

11. Allegaert K, Anderson BJ, Verbesselt R et al. Tramadol disposition in the very young: an attempt to assess in vivo cytochrome P-450 2D6 activity. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(2):231–239.[PubMed]

12. Anderson BJ, Allegaert K, Holford NH. Population clinical pharmacology of children: modelling covariate effects. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165(12):819–829.[PubMed]

13. Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW et al. Developmental pharmacology–drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(12):1157–1167.[PubMed]

14. Agunod M, Yamaguchi N, Lopez R et al. Correlative study of hydrochloric acid, pepsin, and intrinsic factor secretion in newborns and infants. Am J Dig Dis. 1969;14(6):400–414.[PubMed]

15. Hyman PE, Clarke DD, Everett SL et al. Gastric acid secretory function in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1985;106(3):467–471.[PubMed]

16. Huang NN, High RH. Comparison of serum levels following the administration of oral and parenteral preparations of penicillin to infants and children of various age groups. J Pediatr. 1953;42(6):657–658.[PubMed]

17. Albani M, Wernicke I. Oral phenytoin in infancy: dose requirement, absorption, and elimination. Pediatr Pharmacol (New York)1983;3(3–4):229–236.[PubMed]

18. Morselli PL. Clinical pharmacokinetics in neonates. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1976;1(2):81–98.[PubMed]

19. Heimann G. Enteral absorption and bio-availability in children in relation to age. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1980;18(1):43–50.[PubMed]

20. Kearns GL, Reed MD. Clinical pharmacokinetics in infants and children. A reappraisal. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989;17(suppl 1):29–67.[PubMed]

21. de Wildt SN, Kearns GL, Hop WC et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of oral midazolam in preterm infants. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53(4):390–392.[PMC free article][PubMed]

22. Gibbs JP, Liacouras CA, Baldassano RN, Slattery JT. Up-regulation of glutathione S-transferase activity in enterocytes of young children. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999;27(12):1466–1469.[PubMed]

23. Haig GM, Bockbrader HN, Wesche DL et al. Single-dose gabapentin pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy infants and children. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41(5):507–514.[PubMed]

24. Ouellet D, Bockbrader HN, Wesche DL et al. Population pharmacokinetics of gaba-pentin in infants and children. Epilepsy Res. 2001;47(3):229–241.[PubMed]

25. Miki Y, Suzuki T, Tazawa C et al. Steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR), cytochrome P450 3A4 and multidrug resistance gene 1 in human adult and fetal tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;231(1–2):75–85.[PubMed]

26. Furue M, Terao H, Rikihisa W et al. Clinical dose and adverse effects of topical steroids in daily management of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(1):128–133.[PubMed]

27. Tetelbaum M, Finkelstein Y, Nava-Ocampo AA, Koren G. Back to basics: understanding drugs in children: pharmacokinetic maturation. Pediatr Rev. 2005;26(9):321–328.[PubMed]

28. Rosenbaum SE. Basic Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: An Integrated Textbook and Computer Simulations. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.

29. Friis-Hansen B. Body composition during growth. In vivo measurements and biochemical data correlated to differential anatomical growth. Pediatrics. 1971;47(1):264–274.[PubMed]

30. Echeverria P, Siber GR, Paisley J et al. Age-dependent dose response to gentamicin. J Pediatr. 1975;87(5):805–808.[PubMed]

31. McNamara PJ, Alcorn J. Protein binding predictions in infants. AAPS PharmSci. 2002;4(1):E4.[PMC free article][PubMed]

32. Anderson GD. Children versus adults: pharmacokinetic and adverse-effect differences. Epilepsia. 2002;43(suppl 3):53–59.[PubMed]

33. Ahlfors CE. Unbound bilirubin associated with kernicterus: a historical approach. J Pediatr. 2000;137(4):540–544.[PubMed]

34. Gulian JM, Gonard V, Dalmasso C, Palix C. Bilirubin displacement by ceftriaxone in neonates: evaluation by determination of ‘free’ bilirubin and erythrocyte-bound bilirubin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987;19(6):823–829.[PubMed]

35. Martin E, Fanconi S, Kalin P et al. Ceftriaxone--bilirubin-albumin interactions in the neonate: an in vivo study. Eur J Pediatr. 1993;152(6):530–534.[PubMed]

36. Krishna DR, Klotz U. Extrahepatic metabolism of drugs in humans. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994;26(2):144–160.[PubMed]

37. Williams JA, Hyland R, Jones BC et al. Drug-drug interactions for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase substrates: a pharmacokinetic explanation for typically observed low exposure (AUCi/AUC) ratios. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32(11):1201–1208.[PubMed]

38. Krueger SK, Williams DE. Mammalian flavin-containing monooxygenases: structure/function, genetic polymorphisms and role in drug metabolism. Pharmacol Ther. 2005;106(3):357–387.[PMC free article][PubMed]

39. Phillips IR, Shephard EA. Flavin-containing monooxygenases: mutations, disease and drug response. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29(6):294–301.[PubMed]

40. Hines RN. Ontogeny of human hepatic cytochromes P450. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2007;21(4):169–175.[PubMed]

41. Koukouritaki SB, Manro JR, Marsh SA et al. Developmental expression of human hepatic CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;308(3):965–974.[PubMed]

42. Lacroix D, Sonnier M, Moncion A et al. Expression of CYP3A in the human liver–evidence that the shift between CYP3A7 and CYP3A4 occurs immediately after birth. Eur J Biochem. 1997;247(2):625–634.[PubMed]

43. Sonnier M, Cresteil T. Delayed ontogenesis of CYP1A2 in the human liver. Eur J Biochem. 1998;251(3):893–898.[PubMed]

44. Stevens JC, Marsh SA, Zaya MJ et al. Developmental changes in human liver CYP2D6 expression. Drug Metab Dispos. 2008;36(8):1587–1593.

Introduction

In this section we take a quick look at the pharmacology of antihypertensive drugs – looking at the various classes, their mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and unwanted effects. Before we begin, however, let’s look at how pervasive hypertension is in modern society.

Approximately one in three adults in the United States have hypertension, but only half of patients diagnosed with hypertension have the condition under control. Statistics show that age, ethnicity, and pre-existing illness all determine the likelihood of developing hypertension. For example, men (age 20-34) are 11 percent likely to develop hypertension, in contrast to older men (age 45-54), where this risk rises to 35 percent. African-Americans are 10-12 percent points more likely to develop hypertension than white Americans. In 2013 alone, there were over 350,000 deaths involving hypertension as the direct/indirect cause.

These statistics bring home the prevalence of hypertension in the United States, but statistics like these can be mapped worldwide. It is with these statistics in mind that we study the pharmacology of antihypertensive drugs – medicines aimed at attenuating these figures.

Pharmacology of Antihypertensive Drugs

There are quite a few classes of antihypertensive drugs; some work as alpha blockers and beta blockers, whereas others work as ACE inhibitors, diuretics, and potassium channel openers. In this summary piece, we will study the following 11 classes of antihypertensive drugs:

These can be divided into drugs acting on the sympathetic nervous system, centrally-acting antihypertensive drugs, drugs affecting the renin-angiotensin system, and vasodilators. We will use this latter classification in our study below, as it conveniently assesses these drugs in terms of their mechanism of action.

Drugs acting on Sympathetic Nervous System

This includes:

  • Beta blockers
  • Alpha blockers

Check out this page for more detailed information on the pharmacology of beta blockers.

Examples of beta blockers include atenolol, metoprolol, and bisoprolol. They reduce blood pressure by antagonising beta-1 receptors – receptors which are located on the heart (this contrasts with beta-2 receptors nestled in the lung). Beta blockers reduce heart rate and myocardial contractility and indirectly reduce renin secretion, among other effects.

Alpha blockers are divided into two groups: selective α1 antagonists, and non-selective antagonists.

Selective antagonists include doxazosin and prazosin, whereas non-selective antagonists include phenoxybenzamine (irreversible) and phentolamine (reversible). Alpha blockers reduce blood pressure by blocking postsynaptic α1-adrenoceptors – lowering peripheral resistance and increasing venous dilation.

Alpha blockers increase HDL (or ‘good’) cholesterol levels, while also reducing triglyceride levels. Unwanted effects with alpha blockers include postural hypotension, lethargy, headache, nausea, rhinitis, urinary incontinence, and palpitations. Selective antagonists are well absorbed from the gut and undergo extensive first-pass metabolism (half-lives: prazosin (3h), doxazosin (10h).

Centrally Acting Antihypertensive Drugs

Examples of centrally-acting agents include clonidine and methyldopa.

These drugs are agonists at α2-adrenoceptors, agonism at presynaptic autoreceptors in the central nervous system. Peripheral arterial and venous tone is reduced by two means: agonism reduces sympathetic nervous system outflow and, second, it increases vagal outflow from the medulla.

Methyldopa is a prodrug – metabolised into its active component α-methylnoradrenaline, a metabolite with potent α2-adrenoceptor agonism activity. Clonidine has also been shown to display agonism at α1-adrenoceptors, resulting in peripheral vasoconstriction. However, this vasoconstriction does not overwhelm the α2 receptor agonism.

Methyldopa is moderately absorbed from the gut and undergoes dose-dependent hepatic metabolism. It has a half-life of 1-2 hours. Clonidine is, in contrast, completely absorbed from the gut and is eliminated by a) hepatic and b) renal means. It has a half-life of around 24 hours. Unwanted effects include sympathetic blockade, diarrhoea, dry mouth, sedation, drowsiness, peripheral oedema. Sudden withdrawal of clonidine can cause severe rebound hypertension.

Drugs affecting Renin-Angiotensin System

Many commonly prescribed antihypertensive drugs derive from their effects on the renin-angiotensin system. Among their classes include:

  • ACE inhibitors (enalapril, Ramipril, Lisinopril etc.)
  • Angiotensin receptor antagonists (candesartan, losartan, valsartan etc.)
  • Direct renin inhibitors (aliskiren)

Check out this page for more detailed information on the pharmacology of ACE inhibitors.

ACE inhibitors reduce blood pressure by several means, including: reducing circulating angiotensin II and subsequent release of aldosterone, inhibition of tissue ACE from the vascular wall, and reduction of angiotensin II-mediated potentiation of the sympathetic nervous system. Unwanted effects include a persistent dry cough, postural hypotension, taste disturbance, rash, and angioedema.

Patients experiencing a persistent dry cough with an ACE inhibitor are commonly switched to an angiotensin receptor antagonist – drugs which are selective for the AT1 receptor subtype (located in the heart, kidney, vasculature, lung, brain, and adrenal cortex). Angiotensin II is inhibited as it causes vasoconstriction, aldosterone release, sympathetic stimulation, and water retention.

Losartan is well absorbed from the gut, though its oral bioavailability is quite low. It has a half-life of approximately 2 hours (the active metabolite has a half-life of 6 hours). Losartan is a competitive antagonist of the AT1 receptor, whereas its metabolite is a non-competitive antagonist. Unwanted effects with angiotensin receptor antagonists include headache, dizziness, bone pain, muscle pain, and fatigue.

Aliskiren – a direct renin inhibitor – binds to the renin enzyme and prevents binding of angiotensin I. As a result, angiotensin II synthesis is reduced – leading to vasodilation. It is poorly absorbed from the gut and is excreted unchanged in the bile. It has a very long half-life of around 38 hours. Unwanted effects include diarrhoea and cough.

Vasodilators

The next class in our summary of the pharmacology of antihypertensive drugs is vasodilators, among them being:

  • Diuretics
  • Calcium channel blockers
  • Potassium channel openers

Diuretics are themselves divided into thiazide (and ‘thiazide-like’) diuretics, loop diuretics, and potassium-sparing diuretics. Check out this page for more detailed information on the pharmacology of diuretics.

Calcium channel blockers include amlodipine, diltiazem, nifedipine, and verapamil. They lower blood pressure by arterial vasodilation. Potassium channel openers – such as minoxidil – work by acting on ATP-sensitive Kir subunit in order to open KATP channels – resulting in the efflux of potassium from the cell. This hyperpolarisation causes calcium channels to close, leading to relaxation of the vasculature.

Minoxidil is well absorbed from the gut and has a short half-life of around 2-4 hours. Unwanted effects include flushing, headache, tachycardia and palpitations (reflex responses), and hirsutism. Sodium nitroprusside is the most common nitrovasodilator used for its antihypertensive effects. It works in a similar way to organic nitrates. It is administered by IV infusion. Unwanted effects include headache, dizziness, retching, and abdominal pain.

That’s about it for the pharmacology of antihypertensive drugs. Go to this page to find out more about how you can test your knowledge of this drug class – ten questions covering just about everything you need to know

Post Views: 100

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *