Priapulus Caudatus Classification Essay

Priapulida (priapulid worms, from Gr. πριάπος, priāpos 'Priapus' + Lat. -ul-, diminutive), sometimes referred to as penis worms is a phylum of unsegmented marine worms. The name of the phylum relates to the Greek god of fertility, because their general shape and their extensible spiny introvert (eversible proboscis) may recall the shape of a penis. They live in the mud and in comparatively shallow waters up to 90 metres (300 ft) deep. Some species show a remarkable tolerance for hydrogen sulfide and anoxia.[3] They can be quite abundant in some areas. In an Alaskan bay as many as 85 adult individuals of Priapulus caudatus per square meter has been recorded, while the density of its larvae can be as high as 58,000 per square meter.[4]

Together with Echiura and Sipuncula, they were once placed in the taxon Gephyrea, but consistent morphological and molecular evidence supports their belonging to Ecdysozoa, which also includes arthropods and nematodes. Fossil findings show that the mouth design of the stem-arthropod Pambdelurion is identical with that of priapulids, indicating that their mouth is an original trait inherited from the last common ancestor of both priapulids and arthropods, even if modern arthropods no longer possess it.[5] Among Ecdysozoa, their nearest relatives are Kinorhyncha and Loricifera, with which they constitute the Scalidophora clade named after the spines covering the introvert (scalids).[6] They feed on slow-moving invertebrates, such as polychaete worms.

Priapulid-like fossils are known at least as far back as the Middle Cambrian. They were likely major predators of the Cambrian period. However, crown-group priapulids cannot be recognized until the Carboniferous.[1] About 20 extant species of priapulid worms are known, half of them being of meiobenthic size.[7]

Anatomy[edit]

Priapulids are cylindrical worm-like animals, ranging from 0.2–0.3[8] to 39 centimetres[9] ( 0.08–0.12 to 15.35 in) long, with a median anterior mouth quite devoid of any armature or tentacles. The body is divided into a main trunk or abdomen and a somewhat swollen proboscis region ornamented with longitudinal ridges. The body is ringed and often has circles of spines, which are continued into the slightly protrusible pharynx. Some species may also have a tail or a pair of caudal appendages. The body has a chitinous cuticle that is moulted as the animal grows.[10]

There is a wide body-cavity, which has no connection with the renal or reproductive organs, so it is not a coelom; it is probably a blood-space or hemocoel. There are no vascular or respiratory systems, but the body cavity does contain phagocytic amoebocytes and cells containing the respiratory pigmenthaemerythrin.[10]

The alimentary canal is straight, consisting of an eversible pharynx, an intestine, and a short rectum. The pharynx is muscular and lined by teeth.[10] The anus is terminal, although in Priapulus one or two hollow ventral diverticula of the body-wall stretch out behind it.

The nervous system consists of a nerve ring around the pharynx and a prominent cord running the length of the body with ganglia and longitudinal and transversal neurites consistent with an orthogonal organisation.[11] The nervous system retains a basiepidermal configuration with a connection with the ectoderm, forming part of the body wall. There are no specialized senseorgans, but there are sensory nerve endings in the body, especially on the proboscis.[10]

The priapulids are gonochoristic, having two separate sexes (i.e. male and female)[12] Their male and female organs are closely associated with the excretory protonephridia. They comprise a pair of branching tufts, each of which opens to the exterior on one side of the anus. The tips of these tufts enclose a flame-cell like those found in flatworms and other animals, and these probably function as excretory organs. As the animals mature, diverticula arise on the tubes of these organs, which develop either spermatozoa or ova. These sex cells pass out through the ducts.

Reproduction and development[edit]

Priapulid development has been reappraised recently because early studies reported abnormal development caused by high temperature of embryo culture. For the species Priapulus caudatus, the 80 µm egg undergoes a total and radial cleavage following a symmetrical and subequal pattern.[13] Development is remarkably slow, with the first cleavage taking place 15 hours after fertilization, gastrulation after several days and hatching of the first 'lorica' larvae after 15 to 20 days.[14] In current systematics, they are described as protostomes, even if they have a deuterostomic development.[15] It is assumed the reason is because the group is so ancient that the original deuterostome traits that are assumed to have been present in early animals, are still there.[16]

Fossil record[edit]

Stem-group priapulids are known from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, where their soft-part anatomy is preserved, often in conjunction with their gut contents – allowing a reconstruction of their diets.[17] In addition, isolated microfossils (corresponding to the various teeth and spines that line the pharynx and introvert) are widespread in Cambrian deposits, allowing the distribution of priapulids – and even individual species – to be tracked widely through Cambrian oceans.[18]Trace fossils that are morphologically almost identical to modern priapulid burrows (Treptichnus pedum) officially mark the start of the Cambrian period, suggesting that priapulids, or at least close anatomical relatives, evolved around this time.[17] Crown-group priapulid body fossils are first known from the Carboniferous.[1]

Classification[edit]

See also: List of bilateral animal orders

Uncertain relationship

"Class" Palaeoscolecida

Stem-group Priapulida

Class †Archaeopriapulida
Family †Ottoiidae
Genus †Ancalagon
Genus †Fieldia
Genus †Lecythioscopa
Genus †Ottoia
Genus †Scolecofurca
Genus †Selkirkia
Family †Louisellidae
Genus †Anningvermis
Genus †Corynetis
Genus †Louisella

Phylum Priapulida

Class Priapulimorpha
Order Priapulimorphida
Family Priapulidae
Genus Acanthopriapulus
Genus Priapulopsis
Genus Priapulus
Family Tubiluchidae
Genus Meiopriapulus (assigned its own order by [19])
Genus Tubiluchus
Class Halicryptomorpha
Order Halicryptomorphida
Family Halicryptidae
Genus Halicryptus
Class Seticoronaria
Order Seticoronarida
Family Maccabeidae
Genus Maccabeus

References[edit]

External links[edit]

Fossil priapulid (Ottoia) from the Burgess Shale, from Smith et al. 2015
  1. ^ abcBudd, G. E.; Jensen, S. (May 2000). "A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 75 (2): 253–95. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00046.x. PMID 10881389. 
  2. ^Théel, Hjalmar. "Northern and Arctic Invertebrates in the Collection of the Swedish State Museum (Riksmuseum). II. Priapulids, Echiurids etc". Kungl. Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar. 40 (4): 8–13. 
  3. ^Oeschger, R.; Janssen, H. H. (September 1991). "Histological studies on Halicryptus spinulosus (Priapulida) with regard to environmental hydrogen sulfide resistance". Hydrobiologia. 222: 1. doi:10.1007/BF00017494. 
  4. ^Kingdoms and Domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth
  5. ^Ancestor of arthropods had the mouth of a penis worm
  6. ^Dunn, C. W.; Hejnol, A.; Matus, D. Q.; Pang, K.; Browne, W. E.; Smith, S. A.; Seaver, E.; Rouse, G. W.; Obst, M. (10 April 2008). "Broad Phylogenomic Sampling Improves Resolution of the Animal Tree of Life". Nature. 452 (7188): 745–749. Bibcode:2008Natur.452..745D. doi:10.1038/nature06614. PMID 18322464. 
  7. ^Meiobenthology: The Microscopic Motile Fauna of Aquatic Sediments
  8. ^Ax, Peter (2003-04-08). Multicellular Animals: Order in Nature – System Made by Man. ISBN 978-3-540-00146-1. 
  9. ^"Halicryptus higginsi n.sp. (Priapulida): A Giant New Species from Barrow, Alaska". 118: 404–413. JSTOR 3227009. 
  10. ^ abcdBarnes, R. D. (1982). Invertebrate Zoology. Philadelphia, PA: Holt-Saunders International. pp. 873–877. ISBN 0-03-056747-5. 
  11. ^Rothe, B. H.; Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (Winter 2010). "Structure of the nervous system in Tubiluchus troglodytes (Priapulida)". Invertebrate Biology. 129: 39. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7410.2010.00185.x. 
  12. ^Pechenik, J. A. (2009). Biology of the Invertebrates (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 454. ISBN 978-0-07-302826-2. 
  13. ^Wennberg, S. A.; Janssen, R.; Budd, G. E. (May–June 2008). "Early embryonic development of the priapulid worm Priapulus caudatus". Evolution & Development. 10 (3): 326–338. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00241.x. 
  14. ^Janssen, R.; Wennberg, S. A.; Budd, G. E. (26 May 2009). "The hatching larva of the priapulid worm Halicryptus spinulosus". Frontiers in Zoology. 6: 8. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-8. PMC 2693540. PMID 19470151. 
  15. ^Martín-Durán, J. M.; Janssen, R.; Wennberg, S.; Budd, G. E.; Hejnol, A. (2012). "Deuterostomic development in the protostome Priapulus caudatus". Current Biology. 22 (22): 2161–2166. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.037. PMID 23103190. 
  16. ^Penis worms show the evolution of the digestive system
  17. ^ abVannier, J.; Calandra, I.; Gaillard, C.; Zylinska, A. (2010). "Priapulid worms: Pioneer horizontal burrowers at the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary". Geology. 38 (8): 711–714. doi:10.1130/G30829.1. 
  18. ^Smith, M. R.; Harvey, T. H. P.; Butterfield, N. J. (July 2015). "The macro- and microfossil record of the Cambrian priapulid Ottoia". Palaeontology. 58 (4): 705–721. doi:10.1111/pala.12168. 
  19. ^Adrianov A. V, Malakhov V. V. 2001. Symmetry of priapulids (Priapulida). 1. Symmetry of adults. 247:99–110.
  • Boilly B (1974) Ultrastructure des hématies anuclées de Magelona papillicornis F. Muller (Annélide polychète). J Microsc 19: 47–58Google Scholar

  • Chadwick RA, Klippenstein GL (1983) The oxygen binding properties of myohemerythrin and hemerythrin. Comp Biochem Physiol 74A: 687–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Chuang SH (1964) The circulation of coelomic fluid in Lingula unguis. Proc Zool Soc Lond 143: 221–237Google Scholar

  • Dales RP (1963) Annelids. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar

  • Fange R, Akesson B (1951) The cells of the coelomic fluid of priapulides and their content of hemerythrin. Ark Zool 3: 25–31Google Scholar

  • Fange R, Mattison A (1961) Function of the caudal appendage of Priapulus caudatus. Nature (London) 190: 1216–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Florkin M (1933) Recherches sûr l’hémerythrines. Arch Int Physiol 36: 247–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Garbett K, Darnall DW, Klotz IM (1971) The effects of bound anions on the reactivity of residues in hemerythrin. Arch Biophys Biochem 142: 455–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Henry RP (1987) Invertebrate red blood cell carbonic anhydrase. J Exp Zool 242: 113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyman LH (1951) The invertebrates, vol III. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

  • Hyman LH (1959) The Invertebrates, vol V. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson JM (1981) Respiratory anatomy of two marine annelids. MA Thesis Coll William and Mary, Williamsburg, VAGoogle Scholar

  • Jouin C, Toulmond A (1989) The ultrastructure of the gill of the lugworm Arenicola marina (L.) (Annelida, Polychaeta). Acta Zool 70: 121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Klippenstein GL (1980) Structural aspects of hemerythrin and myohemerythrin. Am Zool 20: 39–51Google Scholar

  • Manavalaramanujam R (1981) A comparative study on the myohemerythrin concentration in sipunculan worms. Natl Acad Lett 4: 41–43Google Scholar

  • Mangum CP (1976) Primitive respiratory adaptations. In: Newell RC (ed) Adaptation to environment. Butterworths, London, pp 191–278Google Scholar

  • Mangum CP (1977) Annelid hemoglobins: a dichotomy in structure and function. In: Reish DJ, Faucald, K (eds) Essays in memory of Dr. Olga Hartman. Allan Hancock Found. Univ S Calif, Los Angeles, pp 407–425Google Scholar

  • Mangum CP (1978) Temperature adaptation. In: Mill PJ (ed) Physiology of annelids. Academic Press, London, pp 447–478Google Scholar

  • Mangum CP (1985) Oxygen transport in invertebrates. Am J Physiol 248: R505–R514PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Mangum CP, Burnett LE (1986) The CO2 sensitivity of the hemocyanins and its relationship to CI-- sensitivity. Biol Bull 171: 248–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Mangum CP, Burnett LE (1987). Response of sipunculid hemerythrins to inorganic ions and CO2. J Exp Zool 244: 59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Mangum CP, Kondon M (1975) The role of coelomic hemerythrin in the sipunculid worm Phascolopsis gouldi. Comp Biochem Physiol 50A: 777–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Mangum CP, Mauro NA (1982) Metabolism of invertebrate red cells: a vacuum in our knowledge. In: Gilles R (ed) Circulation, respiration and metabolism. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York pp 280–300Google Scholar

  • Manwell C (1958) Oxygen equilibrium of Phascolosoma agassizii hemerythrin. Science 127: 592–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Manwell C (1960a) Histological specificity of respiratory pigments. II. Oxygen transfer systems involving hemerythrins in sipunculid worms of different ecologies. Comp Biochem Physiol 1: 277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Manwell C (1960b) Oxygen equilibrium of brachiopod hemerythrin. Science 132: 550–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Manwell C, Baker CMA (1988) Magelona hemerythrin: tissue specificity, molecular weights and oxygen equilibria. Comp Biochem Physiol 89B: 453–465Google Scholar

  • Mattison A, Fange R (1973) Ultrastructure of erythrocytes and hemocytes of Priapulus caudatus (DeLamarck) (Priapulide). J Morphol 140: 367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Morse MP (1981) Meiopriapulus fijiensis n. gen., n. sp.: an interstitial priapulid from coarse sand in Fiji. Trans Am Microsc Soc 100: 239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Peebles F, Fox DL (1933) The structure, functions and general reactions of the marine sipunculid worm Dendrostoma zostericola. Bull Scripps Inst Oceanogr 3: 201–224Google Scholar

  • Pörtner H-O (1982) Biochemische und physiologische Anspassungen an das Leben im marinen Sediment: Untersuchungen am Spritzwurm Sipunculus nudus L. PhD Thesis, Univ DuesseldorfGoogle Scholar

  • Pörtner H-O, Heisler N, Grieshaber MK (1985) Oxygen consumption and mode of energy production in the intertidal worm Sipunculus nudus (L.): definition and characterization for the critical PO2 for an oxyconformer. Respir Physiol 59: 361–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Richardson DE, Reem RE, Solomon EI (1983) Cooperativity in oxygen binding to Lingula reevii hemerythrin: spectroscopic comparison to sipunculid hemerythrin coupled binuclear iron active site. J Am Chem Soc 105: 7780–7781CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Richardson DE, Emad M, Reem RC, Solomon EI (1987) Allosteric interactions in sipunculid and brachiopod hemerythrins. Biochemistry 26: 1003–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruppert EE, Rice ME (1990) Microanatomy and ultrastructure of subepidermal coelomic canals in Sipunculus nudus (Sipuncula). Am Zool 30: 115AGoogle Scholar

  • Sippl MJ (1984) On the origin of globins: structural relations between the globin exon products. Life Chem Rep Suppl 1: 223–224Google Scholar

  • Storch V, Higgins RP, Morse MP (1989) Ultrastructure of the body wall of Meiopriapulus fijiensis. Trans Am Microsc Soc 100: 319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Terwilliger NB, Terwilliger RC, Schabtach E (1985) Intracellular respiratory proteins of Sipuncula, Echiura and Annelida. In: Cohen WD (ed) Blood cells of marine invertebrates. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 193–226Google Scholar

  • Valembois P, Boiledieu D (1980) Fine structure and functions of haemerythrocytes and leucocytes of Sipunculus nudus. Morphology 163: 69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Volbeda A, Hol WGJ (1989) Pseudo 2-fold symmetry in the copper-binding domain of arthropodan hemocyanins. J Mol Biol 206: 531–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Weber RE, Fange R (1980) Oxygen equilibrium of Priapulus hemerythrin. Experientia 36: 427–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Weber RE, Fange R, Rasmussen KK (1979) Respiratory significance of priapulid hemerythrin. Mar Biol Lett 1: 87–97Google Scholar

  • Wells RMG (1982) Respiratory characteristics of the blood pigments of three worms from an intertidal mudflat. N Z J Zool 9: 243–248Google Scholar

  • Wells RMG, Dales RP (1974) Oxygenational properties of hemerythrin in the blood of Magelona papillicornis. Comp Biochem Physiol 49A: 57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 0 comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *